The Science


It is very risky, if not perilous, to assume that those in positions of responsibility are responsible

- David McCullough,  American author, narrator, historian, and lecturer. He is a two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize


At right is a link to an exhaustive RAND

Corporation review of vaccine side effects

from 2014, that finds strong evidence that

vaccines cause Guillain-Barre Syndrome,

myalgia, seizures, meningitis, encephalitis

and then some.

RAND’s own researchers independently found that

vaccines cause serious, permanent side effects

in some children.

This was even true when the RAND analysis excluded

the most toxic vaccines that have been discontinued.


So,  real scientific analysis shows vaccines

are unsafe.



Now,  most children who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines have a preexisting predispositions, which increase their susceptibility.


Adverse events can be specific to the particular vaccine, while others may be more generalized. Some of these adverse events may be predictable, while others are not.


The best-understood vaccine-associated adverse effect is the occurrence of invasive disease , such as vaccine measles induced encephalitis. The live vaccines such as VZV, MMR, and oral polio vaccine would be able to cause such an adverse event.


Invasive disease may also occur by viral reactivation in individuals who previously received these vaccines while healthy, but who subsequently become immunocompromised, Or in the case of the ill-fated Lyme vaccine, where those who stepped up to get the vaccine (previous Lyme patients) may have still had their Lyme infection and the vaccine actually reactivated it.    


Previously unrecognized immunodeficiencies or immunoexcitotoxicity will predispose someone to a vaccine adverse event.


Known triggering antigens include egg and gelatin; however, not everyone with allergies to these antigens will go on to develop an adverse event, but it does increase the risk for one.


Genetic polymorphisms (variants) in ICAM-1, SCN1A, CSF-3, and IL-4 are associated with more severe adverse events for certain vaccines.


We know far less about the immune system than we need to know to intelligently administer vaccines to all individuals – is it reasonable to think that one size will fit all when there is so much we don't know?


The Institute of Medicine was ordered by the CDC not to review the mercury related literature of their latest 2011 adverse events report, which is technically an obstruction of justice because Congress directed that IOM advise the vaccine court on the developing science.


This is a conundrum for physicians, not just because they are not aware that the CDC is running interference on helping the medical community understand the science.


If physicians are not being informed of the truth by the CDC and others, you end up with (politician) physicians who may think they are doing the right thing when they are doing the wrong thing. Either they don't know they have been mislead or they don't want to know. Physicians really have no concept that the CDC would mislead them.


So, reading the package insert becomes cognitive dissonance to physicians, so they don't read the inserts and don't share the information with patients, , for example:


here is the actual language:


‘Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.’ - DTaP package insert


That is a whole lot of risk for a vaccine that does not stop the spread of the bacteria and whose effectiveness is so ephemeral. That is the science. Are vaccines part of science or are they Infectious Disease theatre?


There are probably 50 million adult Americans with a Borrelia infection (Lyme Disease) in the USA alone and yet you don't hear any outcry about that because there isn't something to sell, and insurance companies would be financially devastated. If a celebrity gets Lyme disese you hear about that, but beyond that... not much. There may be as many as half a million new cases of Lyme disease in the USA every year - there is no law that requires the blood supply to be tested, no emergency public health interventions.... almost nothing! There will never be a viable vacine for Lyme because the disease does not fit a vaccine model and almost all the drugs you can treat it with are off-patent.


It makes one wonder about what this is all about, but even more than that... it is about an intervention that the Supreme Court has indicated is unavoidably unsafe, when apparently it isn't that effective either. Beyond lack of effectiveness, the vaccines seem to be spreading the disease!


Most people think vaccines protect us from getting diseases we don't want to get, that they stop contagion, that they actually work and are safe, but that is NOT what the independent science has to say. If independent science says one thing and we all believe another thing... what is up with that?


Let's look at just one example of how effective a vaccine actually is: the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine effectiveness against pertussis wanes within 2 to 4 years, according to a matched case-controlled study of patients during the 2012 pertussis epidemic in Washington state.


Researchers conducted a case-control analysis of 450 adolescents who contracted pertussis and 1,246 age-matched controls (3 control subjects for each case) and found Tdap efficacy for the prevention of pertussis as follows:


• overall: 63.9%

• within 1 year: 73%

• 2 to 4 years: 34%


The study authors conclude the lack of long-term protection from pertussis is likely contributing to the increases in pertussis among adolescents.


Citation: Acosta AM, DeBolt C, Tasslimi A, et al. Tdap vaccine effectiveness in adolescents during the 2012 Washington state pertussis epidemic. Pediatrics. 2015;135(6):981-989. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3358.


According to a recent government study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the whooping cough vaccine may keep people from getting sick (as long as immunity lasts which isn't long at all), but it doesn't prevent them from spreading the illness to others. In fact, it turns the recently vaccinated into little Pertussis factories.


"It could explain the increase in pertussis that we're seeing in the U.S.," said one of the researchers, Tod Merkel of the Food and Drug Administration.


"The research used baboons, considered the most human-like model for studying whooping cough. Baboons at ages 2, 4 and 6 months were vaccinated and then exposed to whooping cough at 7 months — when vaccine protection would be new and strong.


"The baboons didn't get sick, but they had high levels of bacteria in their respiratory system for five weeks — which suggest they were contagious for about that long."


Before we get too deep into the science that no one can follow that doesn't have a PhD in immunology, it needs to be stated that there are no safety studies on the vaccine schedule where multiple vaccines are given at the same time. Sure, individual vaccines get tested (to at least some degree), but there is not one study that looks at the cumulative effect of getting all these vaccines over and over and over versus a population that doesn't get any vaccine. This is the infamous Vaxx vs non-Vaxx study that Congress has asked the CDC to do but they never have.


“…incestuous relationship between the public health community and the vaccine makers and public officials… as long as Thorsen [a scientist with connections to the pharmaceutical industry] was cooking the books to produce the results they [CDC] wanted, they didn’t care whether the studies were valid or how much money was being siphoned off the top.”                                                                                                 ---------------------Congressman Bill Posey of Florida


But wait... there is more....




In 2015,  a study is published in BMC Medicine by Althourse and Scarpino: 

Asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis. BMC Medicine, 2015; 13 (1) 


Althouse and Scarpino used whopping cough case counts from the CDC, genomic data on the pertussis bacteria, and a detailed epidemiological model of whooping cough transmission to conclude that acellular vaccines may well have contributed to -- even exacerbated -- the recent pertussis outbreak by allowing infected individuals without symptoms to unknowingly spread pertussis multiple times in their lifetimes.


Their results also suggest that a practice called cocooning, where mothers, fathers, and siblings are vaccinated to protect newborns, isn't effective. 'It just doesn't work, because even if you get the acellular vaccine you can still become infected and can still transmit. So that baby is not protected,' Althouse says.


IN OTHER WORDS, the situation we have now is that it is imperative to vaccinate our children with this vaccine to protect them from the vaccinated, because it is the vaccinated who spread the disease. The current vaccine turns the newly vaccinated into Pertussis factories for weeks or more at a time and this happens every time the child is vaccinated.


While it is true getting the vaccine protects the vaccinated from getting sick or as sick as they could get if they were unvaccinated.... it is getting the vaccine that is now causing the spread of the illness, which in turn causes public health authorities to want to recommend to vaccinate more and more often. When what they should be doing is creating a better vaccine, but they have NO INCENTIVE to create a better vaccine.

This is a good place to also point out there are alternatives to vaccines... alternatives that have been buried so no one would find out about them, such as using Vitamin C to treat Pertussis













































But the Tdap/Dtap isn't the only vaccine that doesn't seem to work all that well. The Mumps component of the MMR is now the subject of more than one lawsuit because it seems that is has zero efficacy.


MMR vaccine - dangerous with no efficacy?


In one legal action, a Qui Tam complaint, Merck will not admit that it does not know (and cannot ascertain, without unreasonable expense and effort) what the present day efficacy rate of its mumps vaccine really is.

This is kind of important if you have been given, as Merck has been given,  a monopoly in selling this vaccine by overstating the actual efficacy rate.


It is no different than grossly underbidding to build a bridge so you are guaranteed the contract. Then telling everyone there is a bridge and to drive over it. When motorists complain that they can't see the bridge they are called anti-bridgers. The bridge builder refuses to say if there is actually a bridge. But not to worry the US Government has set up a special court, funded by taxpayers, that will compensate anyone injured driving over the bridge (the non-existent bridge). The US Government has indemnified the low-bid bridge builder. No motorist can sue the bridge builder for being injured. But when you try and get reparation from the special court that has been set up they make you prove you actually drove over a bridge.


Now, that might seem to be very humorous but that is actually the situation we have today with vaccines. And it should be added, if getting a vaccine were really safe then getting a worthless medical intervention wouldn't be so tragic, but vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe." And when it comes to the MMR vaccine here are a couple of examples:


  • Detection and Sequencing of Measles Virus from Peripheral Mononuclear Cells from Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Autism
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2000
    Hisashi Kawashima, Takayuki Mori, Yasuyo Kashiwagi, Kouji Takekuma


  • This study shows that the measles in the bowels of autistic children is from the MMR vaccine. Excerpt: "Additionally, a new syndrome has been reported in children with autism who exhibited developmental regression and gastrointestinal symptoms (autistic enterocolitis), in some cases soon after MMR vaccine. It is not known whether the virus, if confirmed to be present in these patients, derives from either wild strains or vaccine strains. ..The sequences obtained from the patients with ulcerative colitis and children with autism were consistent with being vaccine strains. The results were concordant with the exposure history of the patients. Persistence of measles virus was confirmed in PBMC in some patients with chronic intestinal inflammation."



  • This study examines the link between autistic behaviors and gastrointestinal disorders and notes a possible link "between GI and behavioral symptoms mediated by innate immune abnormalities.


Notice that Dr. Wakefield didn't have anything to do with the above research papers. Wakefield has been inappropriately turned into a scapegoat. His research was not fraudulent. His co-author has already been exonerated, but just like the media likes to repeat how Lee Harvey Oswald killed President Kennedy -  we are supposed to hear that as many times as it takes until we believe it.


Judge John Mitting’s conclusion, from an appeal by the highly respected pediatric gastroenterologist Prof. John Walker-Smith, stated:

  • “…both on general issues and the Lancet paper and in relation to individual children, the panel’s overall conclusion that Professor Walker-Smith was guilty of serious professional misconduct was flawed…The panel’s determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it.”


Professor Walker-Smith was Andrew Wakefield’s co-author on the highly controversial study published in the medical journal The Lancet in 1998.  While John Walker-Smith received funding to appeal the GMC (General Medical Council) decision from his insurance carrier, his co-author Andrew Wakefield did not — and was therefore unable to mount an appeal in the high court. 


Switching gears for a moment, we know the CDC has refused to do a vaccinated vs unvaccinated study despite Congressional requests to do so, and it is unfortunate that if you say the CDC says the sky is falling almost everyone believes what the CDC says, and will believe the sky is falling, but the Infectious Disease Division of the CDC is as corrupt and corruption can get


Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children


Direct comparison KIGGS study (and other studies) and (July 2012)












































What happens when you try and fool mother nature.?... Measles vaccination drops titer levels in the population....the exact opposite one would expect and hope for. So much for Herd immunity. But it is impossible to have an open discussion now in the medical community about vaccine policy, because all the key decision makers are all compromised.. ethically and financially

Measles Virus Neutralizing Antibodies in Intravenous Immunoglobulins:is an Increase by Re-Vaccination of Plasma Donors possible?
Jens Modrof, et al.
 The Journal of Infectious Diseases
jix428, 18 August 2017

That is why a model of future measles looks bleak but there is no stopping the vaccine juggernaut that is a multi-billion dollar profit machine that has no liability:


Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jul;120(1):39-48.

The future of measles in highly immunized populations. A modeling approach.

Levy DL.


Little is known about how an intensive measles elimination program changes the overall immune status of the population. A computer model was created to study the effect of the measles elimination program in the United States on the number of susceptibles in the population. The simulation reveals that in the prevaccine era, approximately 10.6% of the population was susceptible to measles, most of whom were children less than 10 years of age. With the institution of the measles immunization program, the proportion of susceptibles in the population fell to 3.1% from 1978 through 1981, but then began to rise by approximately 0.1% per year to reach about 10.9% in the year 2050. The susceptibles at this time were distributed evenly throughout all age groups. The model did not consider the potential effect of waning immunity. The results of this study suggest that measles elimination in the United States has been achieved by an effective immunization program aimed at young susceptibles combined with a highly, naturally immunized adult population. However, despite short-term success in eliminating the disease, long-range projections demonstrate that the proportion of susceptibles in the year 2050 may be greater than in the prevaccine era. Present vaccine technology and public health policy must be altered to deal with this eventuality.



What is the suppressed alternative in treating Measles?

Let's say all Measles breaks lose and cases are springing up all over... it could happen because the vaccine has not proven itself to provide long lasting protection even when it works and getting multiple boosters doesn't actually improve antibody levels.


Getting vaccinated (if you have never been vaccinated) is one option but it will take over a month to develop the antibodies the vaccine has the potential to create - certainly not a solution for such an acutely contagious virus.


Clearly.. to the CDC vaccines are the only answer and even when they come out and say, as in the case of the flu vaccine, there is almost no efficacy in the flu vaccine you should get in anyway because.... THEY SAY SO!


There is a benign intervention you won't hear about:


The International Journal of Epidemiology (2010) found that vitamin A

treatment for measles recommended by the World Health Organization

reduced measles mortality by 62%. " at least two doses of 200 000 IU

for children and 100 000 IU for infants was found

to reduce measles mortality by 62%"



** National Institutes of Health
***Jon Baio, Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders — Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States, 2008, March 30, 2012 / 61(SS03);1-19
****National Diabetes Fact Sheet


 So.... just how corrupt is the CDC?













































Dr. Poling just said that while the government conceded vaccines caused his daughter's autism he also said that  his daughter did not have some really rare disease entity. He said we now know that what is wrong with his daughter is not rare.


Keep this all in mind as we review what the CDC whistle-blower has revealed. 


In August of 2014, a C.D.C. senior vaccine scientist, Dr. William Thompson, invoked federal whistle-blower protection, confessing that C.D.C. scientists had buried data linking vaccines to autism and other neurological harms.


Thompson is an author of two of the three epidemiological studies on American population touted by CDC to “prove” the safety of Thimerosal against developmental disabilities. Thimerosal is a controversial mercury based vaccine preservative that research scientists and vaccine safety advocates have connected to the epidemic of brain disorders in children.


Thompson  says that his bosses at CDC pressured him to alter study results  to conceal Thimerosal’s risks. Dr. Thompson says that his superiors at the CDC Developmental Disabilities Branch pressured him to manipulate the study’s findings and to bury the links between Thimerosal and brain damage.   


Thompson was co-author of a 2004 study in Pediatrics in which he now admits that, under pressure from CDC bosses, his team fraudulently withheld data demonstrating a significant link between the MMR vaccine and autism in African American boys.


Thompson confessed, “I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I’ve – I’ve been part of the problem.”


In a written statement issued by Thompson’s attorney, Rick Morgan of Morgan Verkamp of Cincinnati, Ohio – a firm that specializes in Federal whistle-blower cases – Thompson said: “I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”


 “I have a boss who is asking me to lie. The higher ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it. I was, in terms of chain in command, I was number four out of the five. Colleen [Boyle] was the Division Chief. Marshalyn [Yeargin-Allsopp] was a Branch Chief. Frank [DeStefano] was a Branch Chief at the time.”


Immediately after release of Thompson’s revelations, Dr. Frank DeStefano, now Chief of the Immunization Safety office, admitted in a September interview to CBS reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, that vaccines may indeed trigger autism in some vulnerable children.


 “If forced to testify, I’m not going to lie. I basically have stopped lying.”


Thompson says that corruption is so rooted within the Immunization Safety Office that the only way to get to the truth now is for Congress to take the vaccine safety research away from CDC and give it to independent contractors who can create a transparent process. According to Thompson, the autism controversy has brought vaccine safety research to a halt. “CDC is….they’re paralyzed. The whole system is paralyzed right now and the whole branch is paralyzed and it’s becoming more paralyzed. So there is less and less being done, as the place just comes to a grinding halt.”


“I have great shame now when I meet a family with kids with autism, because I have been a part of the problem….Here’s what I shoulder. I shoulder that the CDC has put the research ten years behind. Because the CDC has not been transparent, we’ve missed ten years of research, because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing. They are afraid to look for things that might be associated. There’s still a lot of shame with that….”



In 2004, he sent a letter to CDC Director, Julie Gerberding alerting her that CDC scientists were breaking research protocols to conceal the links between Thimerosal and brain damage in children. Gerberding never responded to Thompson’s allegations, but her deputy, Robert Chen, then head of CDC’s Immunization Safety Office and Thompson’s direct boss, confronted Thompson in an agency parking lot threatening him and screaming, “I would fire you if I could.”


In 2009, Gerberding matriculated to Merck as Chief of the company’s Vaccine Division. Two years prior to the move, she approved Merck’s HPV vaccine for pre-adolescent girls – an estimated billion dollar value to the company. Following Thompson’s revelations, Merck transferred Gerberding from its Vaccine Division to Executive Vice President for Strategic Communications, Global Public Policy and Population Health.


Thompson is not the first scientist to complain about pressure from his bosses at CDC’s Immunization Safety Office. In 2001, CDC researcher, Thomas Verstraeten, made similar allegations. Verstraeten was the co-author of the first of three studies offered by CDC to exculpate Thimerosal from developmental disorders. (Verstraeten et al. 2003 Pediatrics 112:1039) Verstraeten’s initial analysis showed correlations between Thimerosal and autism – and a host of other neurological disorders – comparable to the causal relationship between cigarettes and lung cancer.


Over the next three years, a team of CDC researchers produced five consecutive versions of the report; each one eliminating more people and watering down the Thimerosal/brain damage relationship. Finally Verstraeten complained on July 14, 2000 in an email to toxicologist, Phillipe Grandjean, a CDC consultant, “I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby…..but at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory”


When CDC tried to present the watered down version of the study as proof of Thimerosal’s safety, Verstraeten wrote a strong rebuke to CDC scolding the agency for misrepresenting the study as an exculpation of the Thimerosal autism link.

There is no authority in science. Instead it is the nature of science to question everything. If there is an authority in science it is evidence and judgment. If there is an authority in medicine it is the evidence based medicine which is a synthesis of the best evidence available, physician judgment and patient preferences.

CDC and NIH employees should never be viewed as authority.

The CDC is fond of saying there is no link between vaccines and autism but the research says something else:




Pertussis cases in the United States from 1922 through 2012 and in the UK from 1940 through 2013. Shaded regions correspond to the pre-vaccine era, the DTP era, and the DTaP era, respectively.


What you are looking at is Pertusis rates in the USA starting to return to Pre-vaccine era rates due to the spread of whooping cough from vaccinated individuals.


In other words, a medical intervention is mandated that has only modest short-lived efficacy, but in trade for short term illness protection for those who retain modest immunity to the bacteria, they themselves turn into whooping cough factories spreading the bacteria far and wide as an article from Boston Univ in 2017 indicates.


Graphic Credit: Courtesy of B. Althouse and S. Scarpino

Boston University School of Public Health:
"The startling global resurgence of pertussis, or whooping cough, in recent years can largely be attributed to the immunological failures of acellular vaccines, School of Public Health researchers argue in a new journal article."
“This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”
“The resurgence of pertussis in the aP vaccine era is evolving into a slow-moving global public health crisis,” the researchers wrote. “But, with the public’s trust in vaccines waning, this has also become a public relations crisis.”

The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children via an internet questionnaire by and Andreas Bachmair.


The study was self-funded.



The above chart was created by Jame Lyons-Weiler and you can read the relevant studies on his website. In one of the reports, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) found Destefano et al. 2004, to be fatally flawed, and based their conclusion on FOUR studies.  Yet the IOM met-analysis that followed included consideration of the studies IOM found to be flawed. In today's culture of pseudo-science there is a strange schizoid phenomena where the scientists want to tell the truth but are being paid to come up with per-determined conclusions.



THE FACTS:  Ethyl mercury, unlike methyl mercury, crosses the blood brain barrier MORE quickly than methyl mercury. What doesn’t cross the blood brain barrier may be excreted—or it may accumulate in organs, such as the brain, or the kidneys.


Here, we see evidence of mercury accumulation in both brain and kidneys of thimerosal-injected monkeys, with mercury in the brain at twice the amount of monkeys given the supposedly slower-excreted methyl mercury:


"There was a much higher proportion of inorganic Hg in the brain of thimerosal monkeys than in the brains of MeHg monkeys (up to 71% vs. 10%). Absolute inorganic Hg concentrations in the brains of the thimerosal-exposed monkeys were approximately twice that of the MeHg monkeys. Interestingly, the inorganic fraction in the kidneys of the same cohort of monkeys was also significantly higher after im thimerosal than after oral MeHg exposure (0.71 ± 0.04 vs. 0.40 ± 0.03). This suggests that the dealkylation of ethylmercury is much more extensive than that of MeHg."


And this is what happens when mercury crosses the blood brain barrier:  "How mercury destroys the brain” (University of Calgary):  


Here, the authors conclude: "the kidney must be considered a potential target for etHg toxicity."

Do the Unvaccinated pose a risk to the Public's health?

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions.

Below is a list of the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases.  People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public-school setting may not be warranted.

IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus. Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces.  Please note that wild poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine.  Despite being capable of preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to safety concerns.

Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.

While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheria. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.

The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis. The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.

Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.

Among numerous types of H. influenza, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenza (types a through f). These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children.  The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign.  Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenza disease.

Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces.  Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers.  To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute arbitrary and capricious discrimination.

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:

“The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.”

Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS.  Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine.  These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait.  The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time.  Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.

It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious.  In fact, two major measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated individuals.

The more we vaccinate for Measles, the lower antibody levels drop for Measles in the general population... in other words, herd immunity is being destroyed by vaccinating for Measles the very thing SB 277 was supposedly meant to protect.. herd immunity that is, because there was really no other reason for SB 277 to exist.

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, MMR and Hib vaccines poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. 


Below is a section from the Gardasil 9 package insert:

What this is telling us is that in the clinical studies done on this vaccine 40 deaths were reported out of 29,323 subjects - that is 64 times the death rate from cervical cancer itself in the USA. Now how does that make any sense what-so-ever?

CDC states here that HPV vaccine "prevents" cervical cancer:

Yet, the avg. age for a woman in USA to get cervical cancer is 42 years old. So 12 years ago in 2006 FDA fast-track approves (the NIH owns the technology and therefore the Dept of HHS owns the technology and they control the FDA) Gardasil vaccine to 10-year-old girls and  boys, too.

That means we technically won't know what the Vaccine does at all for another 20+ years.

Teenage girls have no chance of dying from cervical cancer so the risk to benefit ratio is even more extreme.

This is criminal... this is genocide.

I am sure there were many justifications for the deaths other than the most likely cause - who do you think it was in charge of determining what was and what wasn't a side effect caused by the vaccine?


There were 29,323 subjects in the clinical trials. One trial of 594 used a true saline placebo. The others used the aluminum adjuvant as the control - there was no true placebo in those trials because aluminum is in the vaccine to ramp up the immune response, so therefore it cannot be a placebo. There were 40 deaths - 21 in the vaccine group and 19 in the aluminum adjuvant group. 29,323/40=733 There were no deaths in the saline group. If you subtract them, the death rate goes to 1 in 718. Merck says it's coincidence and the deaths were no higher than what would be expected in the general population. They say that because there was no statistical difference between the vaccine (experimental) group and the aluminum (control) group. The most frequent cause of death was motor vehicle accident, with 9 deaths total. Naysayers will say, "So now you're going to blame the HPV vaccine for causing car accidents!" Yes. Here's why... The most frequent non-fatal adverse events were neurological events, including seizures and syncope (sudden alteration of consciousness), which obviously increases the risk of dying in car accidents. According to Dr. Diane Harper, Internationally renowned expert on HPV and principal developer of the vaccine, any protection that is conferred lasts only five years and will leave those vaccinated in adolescence unprotected at the very time when they are most at risk of infection. The vaccine only covers a few strains out of more than 100, which will cause those strains not covered to become more virulent and more resistant to treatment. Regular Pap smears reduced the incidence of cervical cancer in the US by 75% before the vaccine was developed. There is a very real concern that those girls who are vaccinated will have a false sense of security and forego paps, which will increase the risk of developing invasive disease. Cancers that are presumed to be caused by HPV are slow growing and take decades to develop. There has not been enough time since the HPV vaccine was licensed in 2006 to determine if there will be any effect in preventing cervical cancer.